news

The Process of Elimination

The first abbreviated work week of the new year is now all but behind us and nothing truly ground shaking has happened yet in the 2024 presidential election year story. So there’s still time for me to go out on one of those limbs that is, unfortunately, my happy place. 

Obviously I can’t see into the future (okay, maybe that hasn’t always been so obvious) but here’s some things that I think are very likely to happen this year. 

I think it’s ever more likely that either President Joe Biden or former President Donald Trump or both might be unavailable to voters by November. That’s about the most generic way I can put it. Don’t over think it. I’m not. Whatever, however. And look, typically in American politics, election year is almost as much about selecting the eventual party nominees as it is choosing a president. And I get that. In the old days, we didn’t even know until after the conventions late in the summer. So in normal election years past, the parties could take half the year to decide upon their candidate. 

But these are different times and this is a vastly different election year than any of us has ever seen. Trump is now like a mythical American political figure. He’s both a former president and the leader of a movement. MAGA. He has the Republican Party base in a passionately emotional heart and soul head lock. That part of the country is ready to explode as it is right now. Look at January 6th. However you feel about them, those people and that part of America is exponentially more agitated now than they have ever been before. They see these really corrupt banana republic legal efforts (I mean, who doesn’t?) by multiple partisan jurisdictions and entities to remove Trump entirely from the elective process—either by indicting and convicting him or by literally having his name taken off the ballot—and they are quite literally seething.

But no matter the passionate displeasure of so many of our fellow Americans, I think it very possible that these efforts will be successful to the degree where it becomes impossible for Trump to win due to the pile up of enough disqualifying cases and successful efforts to remove the former president from ballots so that the Republican Party, maybe as late as the convention, will then be forced to put forth another candidate at the top of their ticket. Somehow, some way. It might happen.

So let’s just stop right there and consider what that would be like in this country coming at some point later in this already guaranteed to be explosively chaotic election year. 

Everything this massive base of Trump supporters believes is wrong with their party, their country and their elective processes will unfold exactly as they fear, right before their eyes. That alone is going to make for a s— show unlike anything we’ve ever seen. Trump is already a folk hero in much of this country. This will elevate him to political martyrdom. If MAGA can’t vote for Donald Trump on election day the national turmoil this is going to create is going to make, in my opinion, every political uprising we’ve ever seen in this country pale in comparison. JMO. 

But now think of the mad scramble AGAINST THOSE HEADWATERS of the Republican Party trying to replace Trump on the ballot. What an absolute losing proposition. Mission accomplished, Democrats! It’s VERY hard to see any Republican candidate other than Trump bringing out the 80 million or so voters it’s going to take to win the White House. 

Okay? So what about the other side? Well, I think it’s even LESS likely that Joe Biden will be available as the Democratic candidate come November. I’m not even going to go into arguments why. Come on! He’s the incumbent and yet he is DEEPLY unpopular, and the American people believe, quite correctly, that he’s not physically or mentally up to the job and they are, I believe, very disappointed in his policies and in the direction the country is heading. You can pump up, as I know some will, his accomplishments but you’re talking to yourselves. Out there in the eyes of America, this is a president and a party that is in deep trouble. I’ll leave it at that. 

So, just like the Republican Party’s problem, but not as explosively problematic, they’re going to have a hell of time selling either Kamala Harris or Gavin Newsome as America’s best choice for its next president. You could even trot out Michelle Obama and it’s not going to sell with much of this country. Look, I hate to break it to anyone who isn’t quite there yet, but people are REALLY starting to see through this elite duopoly that controls our country and they are, I believe, desperate for another option. Hold that thought. 

But step back now and take in the entire picture. Election Year 2024. Starting right now. Week One. Incumbent president running against his immediate predecessor. Then suddenly, slowly, whatever!, like a disaster movie, one by one or together in short order, both candidates fall out. I’ve only hinted at the actual chaos that will ensue. That chaos, all of it predictable, will only further disgust the American people. 

The spectacle put on by both parties will cause Americans to be even MORE disenchanted with our current national politics. They will be looking for some safe harbor in what would be a complete s— storm of an election year meltdown by both of our major political parties. 

Have I set the stage? I believe I have. 

So now there’s this guy out there named Kennedy who’s managed to get himself on all 50 states’ ballots. There he will be. The son of RFK. People will be hearing his message, which is EXACTLY what they are going to want to hear. If you haven’t heard him, trust me, it’s exactly what the people of this country are going to want to hear, and HAVE wanted to hear, for DECADES. 

These things are all very possible to even more than mildly likely to happen this year. And I think this is how Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will become our next president. And that’s what I’m predicting will happen.

The scenario that I’m describing and predicting is, of course, completely unprecedented. Here now in the year of the election, the two major party candidates, an incumbent president and his immediate predecessor as president, both involuntarily rendered by, in Biden’s case age or infirmity and in Trump’s case the actions of his political opponents, no longer available for the voters to choose as their president. This alone would be something none of us have ever seen before and would set the stage for further unprecedented upheavals.

I mean, we’re clearly heading for something like that on the Trump side of things. This is already very likely to be a quite ugly possibility. But if MAGA can’t vote for Trump because he’s not on the ballot then I predict they’re going to vote for Kennedy.

If both Biden and Trump aren’t on the ballot then I believe Kennedy will win fairly easily and that’s really the point of this piece. I don’t, at this time, want to get into all of the things that have gone wrong in the last seven years under both of these candidates’ administrations and by way of the actions and direction changes of their political parties, but all of that is weighing against the establishment at this time. This is a country that elected a TV guy seven years ago. It remains vastly misunderstood and willfully misrepresented as to why that happened. But here it is. People were just that desperate for someone else. An outsider. Someone who was telling them what they wanted to hear as opposed to someone telling them the same old s—.

This country is on the brink right now. People are already scared. If you had a clean election without RFK Jr. in it, Trump would likely win, but it would be very close. The Democratic Party is scaring the hell out of so many Americans and no one more than those of us who now self-identify, reflexively, and as a pre-emptive act of self defense, as life-long Democrats. And I’m predicting that no matter who is running for either of the major parties the most important collection of letters on the ballot won’t be Kennedy or Trump or Biden or any other candidate’s actual name. It will be the word INDEPENDENT. And that word will be sitting right next to Bobby Kennedy’s name. For that reason alone, even with Biden and Trump still in the race a Kennedy win is possible. But if you remove Trump or both Trump and Biden I think RFK Jr is going to be our next president.

The context all this is taking place in now is so different than anything we’ve ever seen with the exception of what the climate must have been like in America leading up to the Civil War. We are truly living on the brink as a nation of democratic ideals because we have so often and so routinely betrayed those ideals. The chickens have now come home to roost and, as I’ve said, the American people really are waking up and seeing through their government, the relationship between the mainstream media and their elected officials, the donors and industrial complexes who ultimately call the shots, etc. LIKE NEVER BEFORE. The election of Donald Trump in 2016 is all the proof anyone should need that this is the case. Now more and more Americans are there. It’s a trend and it’s going to continue to trend for the rest of most of our lives.

The people of this country are attempting to take it back from those who control it. I would agree with anyone who maintains that it is doubtful as to whether we will actually be able to do so. But the only thing that will stop we the people is undemocratic authoritarianism as realized by the now all powerful duopoly, its donors, and maybe most especially the vast landscape of NGOs that employ the elite political classes that inhabit the Washington DC area and the other affluent coastal regions of the country. This element is already using authoritarian and even fascist tactics to smother free speech on social media or wherever else they may find it and they are NEVER going to stop. Should Bobby Kennedy Jr. become the second President Kennedy he has vowed to dismantle the national security anti-free speech elements in our government and most prominently within the Democratic Party and allow the people of this country to once again speak on their own behalf and be heard. 

Is this Kennedy simply telling so many of us what we want to hear in order to get elected? If you stay tuned you’ll get my take on that and so many other questions and issues that are sure to bombard us here in 2024. Buckle up. This is going to be an election year like no other. 

Days of Agony

The first we heard of sickness back home was mid-November 2021. My wife’s youngest brother, Anthony, an associate English professor at Robert Morris University, was having GI issues. Persistent diarrhea to be exact. Then the entire family still living in our hometown of Aliquippa, Pennsylvania had what seemed to be bad colds, then fevers. 

Bernadette is one of eight siblings: four brothers and four sisters. We’re in Los Angeles. Another sister is in Florida. The other six, along with her youngest sister’s husband and 26-year-old son, lived in three households in the Pittsburgh area. That makes eight close family members in all living in western PA. 

Like a pair of California cliches, we got on Amazon and ordered for Anthony a Chinese herb we’ve taken in the past for digestive problems. He’d been the one relaying information to us here in LA and it wasn’t long before updates on the three brothers living together under one roof in the Plan 12 section of Aliquippa became less frequent but increasingly worrisome. My wife came back to LA in late March 2022 after her first trip home to Pittsburgh since COVID struck her family. She brought back the Chinese herb we’d ordered on Amazon four months earlier. It was unopened.

Throughout the pandemic, most Americans were confused about what exactly to do should they fall ill with COVID. From the first large wave of outbreaks in the US in the late spring of 2020, when hospitals were at or near their capacities due to emergency rooms being flooded with people sick from the novel coronavirus, the official stance centered largely on folks contacting their personal physicians. It seemed from there the advice of doctors was mostly to isolate at home and to not go to a hospital until the onset of significant difficulty breathing.

Of course, many Americans don’t have a family doctor. This inconvenient wrinkle in the American healthcare system would only compound the potential missteps for so many who happened to be suffering a sudden and potentially deadly illness. This certainly played a role in what happened to my wife’s family. So for them, and I’m sure so many others, the confusion about what to do should someone fall ill with COVID, something that persists to this day I would suggest, combined with the realities of the tenuous relationships so many Americans have with their own nation’s health care systems, all but guaranteed countless unnecessarily bad outcomes. 

The part of Pennsylvania where we come from, sitting near the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains, is in the heart of what was once America’s rust belt. Despite being just west of Pittsburgh, with its great universities and thriving downtown, Aliquippa and the surrounding communities, like most of the areas outside of the city, have never really recovered from the decline of the American steel industry. 

So take that national confusion about what to do in the event that you or someone you know should come down with COVID and drop it deep into what’s left of a tough industrial working-class mindset. People are stubborn and apprehensive of even generating an ambulance bill, let alone what might come later in the mail from a trip to the ER. Mistakes will be made. None of the five living in our hometown had a primary care physician and there was a real resistance to dialing 911 in all three households.

When we were able to get through to Anthony, he was often barely able to speak. One evening he told us his next oldest brother, John, was lying half off his bed, semi-conscious. Anthony himself was too weak to check on his oldest brother, “Winnie,” a tough 73-year-old Vietnam vet who was now bedridden in another part of the house. 

Across town from Anthony and his two older brothers, in the DiMattia section of Aliquippa, Mickey, the oldest sister at 70, was sick but able to move around her house and answer the phone. But her younger brother, Jay, 67, who’d moved in with her about a dozen years earlier, hadn’t been out of bed in more than a week.   

Anthony and John are 58 and 60 years old respectively. They are referred to in the family as “the boys.” I’m 65 and I’ve known them since they were 10 and 12 years old. By now everyone fully suspects that this is COVID. Text messages from Anthony told us that things were only getting worse where he was in Plan 12 with his two older brothers. So the day after Thanksgiving we called my wife’s youngest sister, Basie, who lives about 25 miles away on the outskirts of Pittsburgh and told her that the two youngest boys needed to go to the hospital. 

This led to a moment when the unforgiving biological realities of the coronavirus would collide with the uncertainty and suspicions of strong-willed people who had been, up to that very moment, able to live most of their long lives virtually outside of the American healthcare system.  

Basie and her husband Keith were going to make the half-hour drive down to Aliquippa. So the conversation from here in LA went something like this:

Don’t go into the house. Call 911 and watch the EMTs put the boys in the ambulances and then go home. The hospital will admit them. Whatever you do, don’t go into that house and don’t drive the boys to the hospital yourselves. Call 911. 

And this is how we left it. The boys would be getting proper medical care, and that’s all we needed to happen at that time.

But Basie was sure she’d already had COVID back in the spring of 2020. She’d had some minor symptoms consistent with COVID and had lost her sense of smell and taste for weeks. She felt that she had immunity to the virus. Keith also thought that he’d been exposed to COVID at work and could count on having some immunity. And there was that hesitancy to call 911 and incur likely hefty ambulance bills. So the pair did go into the house in Plan 12 and proceeded to drive Anthony and John themselves to the ER at UPMC-Heritage in Beaver, Pa.

This was Friday evening, November 26. 

It’s stunning for us to think about it now, but until this very moment in November of 2021, with the US death toll slowly nearing 800K, neither of us here in California had known a single person who’d had COVID. And after what had been a merciful respite from the many waves of coronavirus here in LA throughout the summer, we felt safe enough in November, with about 60K other people, to go to a Sunday Night Steelers-Chargers football game at SoFi Stadium. 

There’s not a personal story about someone’s tragic experience with COVID that’s likely to hold the average American’s attention for long at this point. We’re all just so over this horrific era in human history. And yet the politicization of the pandemic, on all of its many fronts, from masking and lockdowns to the wars over vaccine mandates and harmful side effects of the jab, seems to grow more passionately divisive every day and will likely be with us long after the last COVID variant disappears over the horizon. 

In the ER the boys sat waiting for hours before being taken back to an examination room where they tested positive for COVID. They were told that their vital signs were good and that it was too many days into their infection for them to receive colloidal antibody treatment. They were given Tylenol and sent home. During the long wait at the ER, Keith had taken Basie home. He then drove the boys back to their house in Aliquippa. 

When we learned that the boys had been sent home from the hospital we were devastated. The family was well into their second week of what we now knew to be COVID and were only getting sicker. By that time, in late 2021, we thought Delta was the most likely variant the family was suffering with and so we knew the danger they were in. These were days of agony for my wife. 

A week after the boys were sent home from the ER, Bernadette walked into our apartment from work with her cell phone to her ear. She was talking with Mickey, her oldest sister. The pitch of Bernadette’s voice froze me in my seat and on the other end Mickey was speaking so loudly I could hear every word she was saying from across the room. Jay’s car hadn’t been started in weeks and he’d gotten out of bed, dressed, and gone outside to move it from the street into the driveway. But that was 45 minutes ago and now, Mickey said, he was just sitting there, behind the wheel. 

I’d experienced something like this before in my life. What I always remember about that time is that it didn’t really seem like what it was. And if it wasn’t for what I knew was happening back in Pennsylvania at this moment, and the stress in my wife’s voice when she came through the front door, I honestly wouldn’t have been paying much attention to what was being said between these two sisters. 

“Tell her to go outside and check on him.” I remember how my words startled my wife. It was as if me simply telling her to tell Mickey to go out and do this most obvious thing had pushed a button that instantly brought Bernadette’s worst fears to the surface. The reality was a most devastating realization of those fears. 

Jay had passed away sitting in the driver’s seat of his car. You never forget these moments in your life. The details of a family tragedy will always burn themselves into your memory. For me it was my wife shouting into the phone over and over again, “He’s dead?” clearly begging for it not to be true. And then her wailing.

This was a family of eight siblings who’d reached, on average, their mid-sixties without ever having lost anyone. Jay’s death was simply unbelievable to all of us. 

Jay had possessed such a brilliant mind that when we were young I remember always being intimidated in his presence. I will never, in all my life, read as many books as Jay consumed in any one single year of his. He was incredibly soft-spoken but he was the kind of person you stepped up to with your own intelligence. What I remember most about every conversation I ever had with him was the questions which so often stumped me but also what an intense and respectful listener he was. I so wish now that I’d spent more of the last 37 years I’ve been in LA back home talking with him and learning from him. 

But we could hardly focus on grieving for Jay. We couldn’t simply do what families do when a loved one passes and try to process our loss. This was COVID-19 and our eyes were wide open. Jay was 67 years old but he was in solid physical condition. He took vitamins by the handful. He walked every day, was a frequent hiker and, for most of his life, a weightlifter. Other than Anthony, he was certainly the next most physically fit member of the family. He had no comorbidities and no health issues at all that the family was aware of and yet COVID had killed him in a little over two weeks. Across town, Anthony, John, and Winnie were likewise three weeks into a virus that so often only begins to do its worst to the human body as infections move beyond the second week. Bernadette was now terrified that she would lose even more family to the virus. 

My wife, her sisters, Keith, and I discussed whether we should tell the boys that Jay had passed. We all agreed that it wasn’t the right time, as we believed that the three were themselves still very much in a fight for their lives. So when Bernadette talked with Anthony the next day and he asked how Jay was doing, she told him that Jay was in the hospital. His response will stay with her always, “That’s where I should be.” 

The next day, Basie and Keith had just left the boys in Aliquippa and called us on their way home. We were told it was a beautiful Saturday in Pittsburgh. I remember my wife and I were driving somewhere in Santa Monica to get dinner and we four were on speaker phone in the car. As far as they could tell the three brothers’ conditions hadn’t worsened and we all took that as good news. I think after such a terrible loss we needed one moment and just one phone conversation that could be characterized as hopeful. But at the end of our conversation Basie added that she had a scratchy throat and felt like she was catching a cold. 

So, if you’re wondering, by now, as everyone reading this must surely be, was anyone in this family vaccinated? The answer is no. No one was vaccinated. There was a very strong anti-vaccine sentiment among the girls in the family that, believe it or not, persists to this day. The boys, however, were far less political and had seemed more or less ambivalent about getting vaccinated against COVID. But, ultimately, none of the four brothers were vaccinated. 

Three Ambulances, Three Hospitals 

The next day Keith drove down to Aliquippa alone to check on the boys as Basie had gotten sicker overnight. Moments after stepping into the house in Plan 12 and without even looking in on the other two brothers, Keith was on the phone with 911. Anthony, a marvelously fit bicyclist and hiker, and a notoriously healthy eater, was unresponsive, apparently conscious but staring blankly and unable to move or speak. Keith immediately suspected that he’d had a stroke. 

Each of the three brothers were taken to different hospitals. Winnie, the Vietnam vet, was taken to the VA hospital in Pittsburgh. He would be there for almost a month as he was treated for a blood clot on his lung. John, who’d been so weak that he was unable to speak on the phone since the entire ordeal began, was taken to UPMC Sewickley Valley Hospital with COVID pneumonia where he would stay for three weeks before being transferred to an extended care facility for an extra month to recover his strength. 

Anthony was life-flighted to Presbyterian, the stellar University of Pittsburgh adjacent medical center in the Oakland section of the city. The main threat to his survival those first weeks he was at Presby was still very much COVID-19. His oxygen levels were so low that the next step would have been putting him on a ventilator. My wife and I here in California were now the family contacts making medical decisions for Anthony. There was a conversation with one of the incredibly kind doctors taking care of him. I remember he used the word devastating to describe the stroke Anthony had suffered. He said it three times. 

The takeaway from the discussion was that given the severity of Anthony’s stroke and the difficulties he would have simply recovering from that level of brain injury, putting him on a ventilator for an indeterminable period of time was something that neither the family nor the doctor felt would have been the best decision for Anthony. 

Fortunately, it never came to that. Slowly, the grip that COVID-19 had on Anthony’s respiratory system eased. Within a month, he would be transferred to UPMC Montefiore which specializes in rehabilitation. But Anthony’s condition was not suitable for the level of rehabilitation therapies offered there so we were immediately tasked with finding a skilled nursing facility that had room for him and, it was hoped, one with a good track record for rehabilitating stroke victims. 

Deciding on where Anthony should go led to one of those cards-on-the-table moments that no family ever wants to face. My wife and I were out walking on Canon Drive on a bright January morning. Her cell phone rings. It’s a patient relations rep at Montefiore following up on what extended care facilities in the Pittsburgh area might work best for Anthony. We step into the doorway of a closed shop and put her on speaker phone. But in order to give informed input on where we would like Anthony to be sent, we now have to have, finally, that no-illusions discussion establishing exactly what his condition is, what it really means, and what his prospects are. 

There’s not much talk about sending Anthony somewhere where he’s going to get specialized physical rehab, he’s far from being a candidate for that. He’s paralyzed, of course, on his right side but they have to keep him restrained because he’s not mentally aware enough to avoid interfering with the IV and feeding tube with the mobility he still has on his left side. These graphic realities of her youngest brother’s condition move across my wife’s face like a shadow. She would tell me later that until that moment, she’d had hope. She’d really thought Anthony was going to get better. 

While all of this was happening, back in Oakdale, just outside of Pittsburgh, Basie had continued to worsen. At one point her son would find her unresponsive in the bathroom. When the ambulance took her away, her husband was too sick himself to accompany his wife to the hospital. Basie would spend the better part of three weeks in the hospital but would ultimately pull through without any long-term complications. Keith would quickly recover from his COVID infection. 

Their slim 26-year-old son, however, would also come down with the virus, and he would develop a blood clot, something that by all accounts was very rare in younger COVID patients. But thankfully, he too would recover within a few weeks. 

Jay’s official cause of death was recorded as a pulmonary embolism, a blood clot in the lung, that came as he and his three brothers were into their third week of being bedridden with COVID. But COVID isn’t mentioned on his death certificate. Anthony’s stroke was caused by a blood clot in the brain. Winnie had a blood clot in his lung. Basie’s biological son developed a blood clot. All within one month’s time. None of these people had been vaccinated. All had COVID. None had received any COVID treatments before presenting with blood clots or the devastating effects of blood clots. None of them were ever placed on a ventilator.

We know that what happened to my wife’s family was unusual. Eight sick with COVID. Six of those eight, very ill. Total time spent in hospital by the family was close to four months. Four blood clots. One devastating stroke that ruined a 58-year-old’s life forever. And one tragic death. Yes, this was unusual. But it wasn’t unheard of during COVID. And it wasn’t anywhere close to being the worst outcome suffered by an American family during the pandemic. 

A Call For Justice

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we were told repeatedly to trust the science. And more than anyone on the face of the earth, the person most representative of the science that Americans were being told to trust was Dr. Anthony Fauci. But now we see that Dr. Fauci may have knowingly circumvented the 2014 directive of former President Barack Obama to pause any further gain of function research on harmful viruses within the American scientific research community. 

We have also recently learned that Dr. Fauci may have influenced the creation of a paper entitled The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 that sought to divert attention away from the idea that the novel coronavirus had been engineered by research scientists in the Wuhan Institute of Virology working off a grant that had come from Fauci’s own National Institute of Health.

If this is true it likely led to a scenario never before seen in human history: A pandemic, actively killing millions around the world, caused by a virus that was created in a laboratory through research that was both outlawed by the government of the United States, while at the same time it was being sanctioned and funded by decision makers at the highest levels of that very same government’s public health apparatus. And the highest-ranking health official of all, someone we now know to have been administratively connected to the risky research itself as well as the deadly lab-leaked pathogen it created, was the most prominently displayed figure on our television screens as the representative of the science that we were being told to trust. 

People have called for something akin to the Nuremberg trials to pursue justice in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Certainly, some form of international world court would be justified and appropriate in the wake of the global death and societal destruction caused by what appears now to have been scientific research gone terribly wrong. Families and victims of what happened over the last four years should be far more than simply present at any such proceedings as mere voices on the sidelines. People who have lost loved ones must have the most prominent of voices in any official proceeding that seeks justice for this most disastrous course of human events in any of our lifetimes.

The court must be unimpeachable in the eyes of the public the world over and the punishments it hands down must be commensurate with the unprecedented loss of life that resulted from both the failures of scientific negligence as well as the intentional bureaucratic acts that paved the way for this human catastrophe. Justice must be served for the tens of millions whose lives were taken if we are to ever trust science again.

Likewise, anyone who participated in a cover up of evidence pointing to a scientifically engineered super-virus and the potential of that virus escaping from the Wuhan Institute of Virology must also face the most severe of punishments.

Just think of what could have been done had we known precisely where and how the virus originated back in the early days of the pandemic. We could have had the most pinpoint focused contact tracing possible enabling us to quarantine only those who had actually been in direct contact with the virus instead of locking down the entire human race for nearly two years. And it is entirely possible that we could have isolated SARS-CoV-2 in one region of the world and avoided completely the deadliest global pandemic in over 100 years.

Aftermath

My wife has lived in LA for 35 years and almost every one of those years, with the exception of 2020, she’s flown home at least three times a year to be with her brothers and sisters. Her love for her family is so strong that it would surely be seen as irrational by those who suggest severing ties with family members who refused to be vaccinated. 

In the 16 months since her first trip back after COVID struck her family she’s gone home to Pittsburgh ten times. She spends most of her time there now with her brother Anthony in the skilled nursing facility where he has been for the last year and a half. Bernadette always believed that Anthony would get better, and at the end of the day nothing she could have been told by those attending to her brother would have changed her mind.

Anthony was a physical specimen throughout his pre-COVID life. He was naturally muscular even as a teenager and was devoted to keeping himself fit. Many years ago, I pointed out to Bernadette how similar in physique, facial appearance and mannerisms her youngest brother was to a young Lebron James. (Except for Anthony being 5’9” and Italian.) And just like that, a lifelong Lebron James fan was born. We all believe that had Anthony not been in the condition he was in he would not have survived COVID. 

My wife’s love and devotion to her brother has lifted his spirits and the many hours she’s spent with him has made a pronounced impact on his progress. Her familial instincts and her faith that Anthony would get better have been proven correct. He has gotten better. He smiles, laughs, and tells us that he’s happy. He can now even stand up on his own and walk short distances. 

But gone is the person he used to be. 

Yes, Anthony can speak. And his mind will sometimes latch onto a big word. But they are only shards of thoughts that don’t really make much sense and are, to his family, only faint reminders of the fierce intelligence that Anthony once possessed. He cannot read. He cannot answer questions. He cannot seem to formulate his thoughts. Gone is the person who spoke and wrote Russian and spoke French and Kazakh fluently. Gone is the person who taught English for 15 years in Moscow and Kazakhstan for the United States Information Service and Georgetown University as a Senior English Teaching Fellow. Gone is the intellectual that Anthony once was. 

I speak now for him and Jay and for my wife and her family and I suspect millions of families around the world when I say that someone has to pay for this. 

A most sincere and deeply felt thank you goes out to all of the independent media voices and journalists for helping, by way of their relentless hard work and dogged professionalism, to provide an appropriate and long-awaited resolution to this piece which was started over a year and half ago. Those journalists have kept this story alive and brought us to this point where we have never been closer to finding out the truth about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. But let this moment be only the beginning of a global effort by humanity to achieve justice for what has occurred over the last four years.

The Piss-Colored Journalism of the New York Times: The newspaper’s jaundiced and dishonest take on Robert F. Kennedy’s big day

Scrolling through the articles on the NYTimes app it was impossible to find the newspaper of record’s coverage of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s announcement that he will be seeking the Democratic Party’s nomination in 2024. There’s a very good reason for that. It wasn’t there. A piece reporting on the fact that a member of the nation’s most storied political family was once again running for president didn’t rate the same visibility on the Times’ app as features with titles like “What Would You Do for a Taylor Swift Sweatshirt?” and “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World.” 

It wasn’t until I came across a tweet on my Twitter app that I was led to the Times’ article on Kennedy’s announcement and the event that was held at a ballroom in Boston’s Park Plaza Hotel.

I’d woken up to the speech. Literally. When I groggily picked up my phone and clicked on Twitter I saw the event being broadcast (not sure broadcast is the right word for it) on Twitter Spaces and caught the entire speech, with the exception of a few momentary glitches, from start to finish. 

To say that the Times’ piece, written by Trip Gabriel, the newspaper’s former editor of the Sunday paper’s “Styles” section, did not reflect the speech I’d heard RFK Jr. deliver would be an understatement worthy of, well, the New York Times’ own penchant for slanting the news and burying important story angles behind walls of misinformation. Gabriel dismissed the event as being a gathering of those with a “shared skepticism about vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry.”

“Mr. Kennedy is the latest in a history of fringe presidential aspirants from both parties who run to bring attention to a cause, or to themselves.” 

That statement is as stunningly off key and out of tempo with the era we’re living in as anything I’ve ever read in the Times. The journalist who revitalized the paper’s Sunday Style section “into a multifaceted presentation of fashion, lifestyle, entertainment and celebrity news” continues:

“For Mr. Kennedy, that cause is vaccine skepticism… at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, he sought to undermine public trust in vaccines.” 

Gabriel states that “Both Facebook and Instagram took down accounts of a group he [Kennedy] runs for spreading medical misinformation.”

First off, it’s hard to read the perspective presented by Mr. Gabriel and reconcile it with the calendar. It’s now 2023. Skepticism of Covid-19 vaccines is a widespread feature of the American political landscape. 

Skepticism of Covid-19 vaccines exists primarily because of the myriad instances of the American people being presented with false and misleading TRUE AND ACTUAL medical misinformation, fed to us by our government, its national health care apparatus, and the establishment news media. Whether it was about efficacy or the prevention of transmission of the virus, medical misinformation told to the public about the vaccines was a feature and not a bug throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. 

There’s so many instances of this happening that I’m not going to bother detailing them. That’s not what this piece of mine is about. It’s also completely unnecessary. If you’re reading this you already know how very often something we were told about the Covid-19 vaccines through official government medical channels here in the US turned out to be incorrect. 

Gabriel also characterized RFK Jr.’s speech as “rambling.” He highlighted the fact that many of Kennedy’s own family members don’t agree with his positions on vaccines. He quotes Bob Shrum, who claims, according to the reporting here that, “Kennedy’s attacks on Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and the federal government’s top medical and scientific agencies would have infuriated his uncle. [deceased former Massachusetts senator and presidential candidate Ted Kennedy]  

This is essentially what the New York Times wants the public’s takeaway to be from its news reporting on the candidacy declaration and near two-hour content-rich speech by the nephew of one assassinated president and the son of an assassinated candidate for the same high office. 

Stick a pin in the assassination angle for a moment.

So I’ve already said that this Times piece reporting on Kennedy’s officially announcing his seeking the presidency in 2024 did not reflect the speech I heard nor the event that I witnessed on admittedly shaky video feeds coming out of Boston. The speech I heard was brilliant. It was not rambling. It was densely filled with the Kennedy intelligence, the Kennedy grace, the self-deprecation, the humility, the humor, the vision, the honesty and the TRUTH, and the exact version of patriotic inspiration that this country is so desperate for. And, make no mistake, Kennedy’s speech demonstrated innately brilliant political instincts. (We’ll talk more about this here on The Lost Democrat very soon.)

OF COURSE this speech was not broadcast live on CNN, MSNBC, or any other national TV news network. Because if it had been carried live on any of the mainstream media outlets, Robert F. Kennedy would already be the odds-on favorite to be the next president of the United States. Because this speech was something the American people have been starving for for generations. It was that good. It was a tonic reminder of all that we wish we could be as a nation and certainly as a Democratic Party that is supposed to represent the people of this country.  

Kennedy appeared to be speaking without a teleprompter. Off the top of his head. Yet the speech had so many signature quote lines that it could and will, I’m sure, be mined for things he might say at his inaugural, should he get that far. Also, the stories he told, so many stories, graphically revealing just how qualified and experienced he actually is to be president and how ready he is to replace the low-grade quality of politicians we’ve been electing to high office now for most of the last two decades. 

Kennedy spoke the truth and nothing but the truth for almost two hours. One highlight that stood out to me was his passionate insistence that the current government of the United States has, not just abandoned adherence to the Constitution, but is actively working to undermine it and the protections it affords the citizens of this country. But, Kennedy asserted, “The Constitution was built for hard times.” 

Know this. The Times piece on Kennedy’s big announcement is a gross misrepresentation of what actually happened in Boston yesterday. It’s author lies about the speech RFK Jr. so eloquently delivered. The comments to the article, so few being evidence of the low online visibility of the piece on the newspaper’s website and app, reflect the opinion of those who read this article but who certainly did not seek out or listen to the actual speech for themselves. 

Kathleen from San Luis Obispo writes: “This is just sad. His father and uncle ran for president with soaring rhetoric–not two-hour rambling speeches–and a vision of America as a beacon of hope for the world. 

Had Kathleen actually heard RFK Jr.’s speech, she would have known that her words were an exact characterization of what that speech contained. 

Brooke’s Mama from NYS wrote: “I hope the Kennedy family arranges an intervention soon. It’s a sad situation when someone has gone off the rails so publicly.”

One comment, however, was truly problematic. No one needs to be reminded of the fate of President John F. Kennedy or his brother Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Their assassinations in the 1960s turned this country upside down and we’ve never fully recovered from those deadly interventions in our elective destiny. But despite the impact those tragedies have had on the country, the world, and certainly the Kennedy family, the New York Times comment moderators saw fit to allow a Mr. Mike from NY to offer this suggestion regarding Bobby Kennedy’s son: 

“Maybe he should share the fate of his betters.”

Incompetence Takes the Stage: The many failures and disappointments of Indictment Day

I watched. All morning. Trump showed up at the courthouse looking grim. The indictments were handed down. The case was pushed to December. Morning turns to mid-afternoon and I grab a nap. 

Waking up is always a blur. I’m bleary-eyed and I don’t understand the simplest of things. I turn on CNN. I hear some stuff, but I’m not sure what to make of it. After ten minutes or so of this, someone comes into focus. 

She’s golden and stands out against the darkness. It seems night has fallen in New York City. Trump Force One has already landed in West Palm Beach. It’s 8:03 PM ET. As usual, I’m right on top of my day. 

It’s Trump’s coronavirus briefing antagonist Paula Reid, the former CBS White House correspondent who has now, inexplicably, ended up on the Cable News Network. But what is she saying? 

“I’ve read through this indictment, Anderson. And he’s being charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records. And in order to charge these as a felony in New York state, you have to prove that these records were falsified in furtherance of another crime. And it’s not clear exactly what that larger crime is because it’s not charged here. Now if prosecutors want to argue that these documents were falsified in furtherance of something that is a federal election law violation, that’s shaky legal ground. I mean, that’s an untested legal theory.”

Anderson Cooper’s expression hasn’t changed since birth. Nothing to see there. 

“Look,” Reid goes on, “This is one of the most historic cases, arguably the most significant case right now in the American court system. It appears to be built on a pretty shaky foundation because it’s not clear what the larger crime is.” 

Admittedly, I’d missed much of the afternoon’s analysis catching up on my sleep. But now I’m thinking that Paula Reid is clearly on her way to FOX News. Nevertheless, it was stunning, while it lasted, to hear someone on CNN actually disparaging this long dreamt of, long awaited, and now finally realized criminal indictment of Donald J. Trump. 

Now would have been the time for popcorn because, surely, the proven mercenary Ms. Reid was about to be eviscerated by the panel. It doesn’t matter who is on the panel. It’s CNN. 

Elie Honig, Former Asst. U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York, speaks: 

“The only way that each of these [34 misdemeanor] counts gets bumped up to a felony, is if you can show that they falsified the records to commit some second crime. And here is where we’re going to run into legal problems. Because the indictment does not say what that second crime is, which is completely inexplicable to me.” 

Next up is Van Jones. And in a comment that seems like what you might expect to hear in one of CNN’s pre-broadcast brainstorming sessions, Jones admits some weaknesses with the charges brought against Trump but then stands up for Bragg and in opposition to the tide that is turning against the Manhattan prosecutor on this early evening of Indictment Day. 

“I had hoped that there would be more in the indictment. And I think that because it is SO thin, it’s giving aid and comfort to some of the worst people in American politics, a rogues gallery. To the extent that you do have a prosecutor who believes in the rule of law and who also thinks that our elections shouldn’t be polluted with lies and hush money and false statements and he’s trying to take a stand, I think that we need to be at least as supportive of Alvin Bragg, at this stage, as this rogues gallery is of Donald Trump.”

Anderson Cooper asks another former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of NY, Jessica Roth, what she thinks of the case.    

“I was disappointed that there wasn’t more in the indictment in terms of laying out the legal theory with more precision. Today was supposed to be the big reveal when we would get that information. To the extent that we would have a sense of what the theory of the case is in terms of what are the crimes that would have been furthered or concealed by the falsification of records, it’s not in the indictment.”

I don’t understand what I’m hearing. I’m even wondering whether I ever actually woke up from my afternoon nap and if this isn’t all some sort of crazy dream. So at this point, I can’t take it any more and reach for the remote to fast forward. But then, at that very moment, at 8:13 ET, CNN switched away from Anderson Cooper to an entirely different panel, this one hosted by Jake Tapper. In the courtroom of public opinion, surely order was about to be restored. 

Around the table are CNN’s political A-Team: John King, Dana Bash, Abby Phillip, and Jamie Gangel. Joining them is former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. Reporters and federal prosecutors are professionals who deal every day in message discipline. But compared to deputy directors of the FBI, they are surely amateurs.

“If I had to characterize it,” McCabe says, “It’s a disappointment. I think everyone was hoping we would see more about the direction that they intend to take this prosecution. What is the legal theory that ties this very solid misdemeanor case, 34 counts of misdemeanors, to the intent to conceal another crime which is what makes it a felony. It simply isn’t there.”

The talking heads on screen are smaller images. The larger shot is of the ballroom at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach where Trump is getting ready to speak. I have to say, I’ve never really seen much from inside Trump’s fabled Florida compound, and I’m impressed. The ballroom is glorious. Over the top? Compared to what? The White House? The interiors of the US Capitol? Anything at all in Europe? I don’t think so. I like big beautiful ornate spaces and I’m not going to fault those who create them. 

The room is filled with a certain kind of American elite. Sassy. Proud. Out front about who they are. I don’t believe they’re particularly representative of the Republican Party. They’re certainly not representative of the Democratic Party. But they are familiar to me. I’m an American. I’ve rolled my eyes at people like these my entire life. But I don’t hate them. And I don’t believe they’re trying to destroy America.

CNN is a television network that seems to be dying a slow painful death. Nothing on the landscape of culture or politics would appear to be able to save them from drifting even further off into the irrelevance that characterizes their current presence on the media and information landscape. But there is one thing that could save CNN, or at least slow its decline for the rest of this decade, and that would be a second Trump administration. 

The vibe in the Mar-a-Lago ballroom is festive. CNN’s Kristen Holmes describes it as having the feel of a rally, with “quite a who’s who of Trump world” in attendance. Someone who I’ve lost track of on CNN even suggested earlier that this speech and this event, not Trump’s earlier announcement of his candidacy, will be seen and remembered as the true kickoff to his 2024 presidential campaign. 

The staging is perfect. The American flags are appropriately placed. CNN itself as well as some very qualified talking heads under their employ has swatted away the charges in New York on behalf of the former president and has delivered a moment so rare in a public official’s life that any politician seeking high office could only have dreamed of such events unfolding as they had when their heads hit their Mike Lindell pillows at night. The only thing we were waiting on was the man himself, The Former Guy, who, having earlier been indicted in New York and having only landed an hour earlier, was, understandably and excusably, slow to seize his big moment. 

The whole world was watching and CNN was ready to broadcast a most incredible and unlikely political rebirthing of Donald Trump. 

Finally, he enters the room. I’ve noticed so many of late in both the mainstream media but especially the alternative press describing Trump as a master politician, albeit inarguably a pure demagogue, ready to chew up and spit out any and all challengers. I can’t agree or disagree. I just don’t know. But as Trump worked the crowd of those lined up to shake his hand in the Mar-a-Lago ballroom after being indicted mere hours earlier and a thousand miles away he certainly seemed an unstoppable political force and the literal master of all he surveyed. 

The truth is that the indictment by the New York DA was a dangerous and obviously politically motivated endeavor. And it backfired immediately. The verdict on the merits of the case as the judgment came down from the most establishment of neo-liberal Democratic Party friendly networks was a scathing rebuke. The stage was set for the master politician to step into the spotlight and take this easy win that had been handed to him on a silver platter by none other than his worst enemies. It was going to be so easy. But then what did Donald Trump do? What did the master politician do with this most incredibly fortuitous opportunity ever presented to him in his short but checkered political career?

Yep. He shit all over it. 

How easy would it have been for Trump to maximize the political victory this day had unexpectedly provided to him. He would have needed some help. If not maybe the ‘best’ people, if he’d at least had competent awake and aware handlers watching the talking heads on CNN’s fileting of Alvin Bragg’s 34 count indictment who might have transcribed just a few of the high points, as I did here in this piece, Trump could have then simply walked out onto his magnificent stage and said, “You know folks, I’m not going to speak about what happened today. I’m not going to give my opinion of the events of the day. I’m going to hold my tongue for another time. But what I’m going to do is read to you right now what was just said on CNN in the last half hour.” 

And then Trump could have read to his guests at Mar-a-Lago and to the world everything that was said on CNN about the case against him that I’ve included here in this piece, with attributions. And then when he was done, he could have taken the transcripts and held them delicately between two fingers as if they were filthy dirty things and then he could have simply opened his fingers and let the papers, along with the international reputations of the indictments handed down against him in New York as well as that of the Manhattan D.A. who brought those indictments, all drop silently and harmlessly to the floor.

Instead, an obviously exhausted, visibly deflated, but still toxically defiant Trump tiredly read an even more tired meandering poorly written and poorly conceived of speech off the teleprompter, choosing not to speak off the cuff and without a script, ironically committing the very same misstep every one of his primary opponents committed against him in 2016 that allowed him to bluster and brag his way to the Republican nomination. 

Trump attacked both the prosecutor in New York and the judge, as well as wives and daughters. It was an ugly, and worse, a boring performance by someone who didn’t have the political instincts nor the good sense to understand the incredible political power of what had just happened to him. Trump seems to be a person who has never learned to take yes for an answer. And if he couldn’t see this moment for what it so obviously was, so obvious that even his most fervent antagonists on CNN had to repeatedly admit it on air, and take advantage of the moment, how could he ever be expected to make sound nuanced and clever decisions in the Oval Office as President of the United States?

After 20 minutes or so of this, CNN cut away from Trump’s speech and back to their panel of talking heads. They too seemed deflated at this point. After setting Trump up for an historic banner moment, the former president provided the failing news network with only devastatingly boring television. 

What happened at Mar-a-Lago on the evening of Indictment Day explained a lot. But it didn’t explain everything. After CNN rescued its viewers from the tired toxic mess that was happening in Florida, it was fittingly Alyssa Farah Griffin, Trump’s own former WH Director of Communications, who offered up maybe the most intriguing thought of the entire Trump era.

What if 2016 was a fluke?  

Send In the Clowns: Don’t you love farce?

One of Matt Taibbi’s best pieces for Rolling Stone Magazine during the 2016 presidential primary season was the equal parts scathing and hilarious takedown, Inside the GOP Clown Car. In the piece, Taibbi writes: 

In the modern Republican Party, making sense is a secondary consideration. Years of relentless propaganda combined with extreme frustration over the disastrous Bush years and two terms of a Kenyan Muslim terrorist president have cast the party’s right wing into a swirling suckhole of paranoia and conspiratorial craziness. There is nothing you can do to go too far, a fact proved, if not exactly understood, by the madman, Trump.

The Democrats didn’t seem to remember that Matt Taibbi when he and fellow Twitter Files journalist Michael Shellenberger faced clowns from the other side of our nation’s political circus Thursday as the two sat before the House Select Subcommittee on “Weaponization of the Federal Government” looking into both federal efforts as well as a number of non-governmental organizations’ influence over the policing of free speech on social media.

Florida congresswoman and former Democratic Party chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz began her five minutes attempting to smear Taibbi with red MAGA paint, deploying one of the most common tactical weapons used against anyone who dares offer a rationally honest take on the now very unfunny political struggles taking place in America at this time. Addressing Taibbi directly in her opening comments, Schultz scolded the decorated journalist. 

The Society of Professional Journalists code of ethics asserts that journalists should avoid political activities that can compromise the integrity of credibility. Being a Republican witness today certainly casts a cloud over your objectivity

In a wild and tense session that saw infighting between representatives of both parties on the panel and allegations of biased unprofessional so-called journalism leveled at the two witnesses, Wasserman-Schultz accused Taibbi of allowing himself to be “spoon-fed cherry-picked information” that is “designed to reach a foregone, easily disputed, or invalid conclusion.” When Taibbi attempted to explain himself—to testify, as the witness he was there to be—Wasserman-Schultz cut him off by reclaiming her time, a move that was used against the two journalists often by the Democrats on the panel.  

One of the most striking moments was when Wasserman-Schultz accused Taibbi of profiting off his role in reporting on the Twitter Files, saying that Taibbi “hit the jackpot on that Vegas slot machine.” Taibbi was able to quickly blurt out that whatever money he’s taken in has gone to the costs of doing the work he’s doing before, you guessed it, the Florida lawmaker quickly shut him off by reclaiming her time. 

In the lecturing rant that followed, Wasserman-Schultz suggested that the journalists were addicted to the “powerful drug” of attention and the journalistic prominence of being associated with the Twitter Files. She added that the social media companies in question were not, in fact, biased against conservative voices. She did not offer Taibbi an opportunity to respond. 

It was only later, when Democratic Representative Gerald Connolly of Virginia repeated Wasserman-Schultz’s assertion that the social media entities involved were not being weaponized against conservative voices, that Taibbi would remind the congressman that the purpose of the committee he himself was sitting on was to address the concern that forces within the US government as well as non-profit organizations funded by taxpayer dollars were being weaponized—not simply against conservative voices—but against the very concept of free speech itself. 

Wasserman-Schultz ended her attack on the two journalists with a stunningly strange and ironic diagnosis, apparently of a condition she believed them both to be currently suffering from.  

Hypocrisy is the hangover of an addiction to attention. 

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is certainly no stranger to the many flavors of hypocrisy as well as questions regarding her ethics. In 2016, after leaked emails showed she and the DNC she chaired unethically favored Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Democratic primaries, Wasserman-Schultz was forced to resign her chairperson’s position. 

But before that career gut punch, in the same year, the Florida congresswoman had earlier come under scrutiny due to her attempts to gut new pending Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regulations designed to reign in abuses by payday lenders. Payday lenders, as it turns out (and pardon the pun, Congresswoman) were well represented in Wasserman-Schultz’s congressional district. This from the Huffington Post:

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is expected to present a final set of payday lending regulations in the next few weeks. The idea is to prevent lenders from trapping borrowers in a vicious cycle of debt, in which borrowers take out a loan expecting to pay a one-time fee, but end up taking out several more loans when they are unable to make ends meet at the end of the loan period.

Wasserman Schultz is trying to gin up support on Capitol Hill for a bill that would nullify the CFPB’s rules in states that adopt payday loan rules similar to those in her home state. The Florida law is supported by the payday loan industry and has not prevented lenders from preying on the poor. The CFPB’s regulations would be stronger, but Wasserman Schultz is seeking to block them.

You can read more here

There was something about 2016 that allowed us to laugh at the clownish characters traveling together in Taibbi’s Republican clown car. Yes, they and their candidacies were dangerous, there’s no question about that. But they were, nevertheless, clowns that we could laugh at. Feckless boobs, each and every one of them, and each in their own unique ways. Taibbi captured them all perfectly in the piece I mention above and so many others. 

But there are funny clowns and there are the scary clowns. And there is nothing scarier than the American government—the government of the most powerful country in the history of the planet—slowly, but most assuredly, turning away from its founding principle of unfettered free speech and towards a concerted governmental effort to eliminate that fundamental American right. And what could be more terrifying than witnessing what was once the party of the people leading the effort to crush the rights of those same people to freely discuss amongst themselves the realities and issues of their times. 

Make no mistake. These are the scariest clowns ever. 

Viewer’s note: 

It wasn’t easy to watch the hearing yesterday. I’d set my DVR to record CSPAN’s coverage of the House of Representatives which begins at 7:00 AM Pacific and was scheduled to run in a single continuous block on my cable provider’s viewer guide until 1:00 PM my time.

I went about my morning knowing that I would be able to watch the hearings when my day settled down. But when I had a minute I decided to check on how things were going at the hearings and turned my set on and navigated to the list of recorded programs in order to watch the opening statements. 

So nothing was recorded. CSPAN had changed the name of the content that would appear in that time slot from NEW U.S House of Representatives to, incredibly, and inaccurately, CAMPAIGN 2024, a title that had absolutely nothing at all to do with the content of the programming on CSPAN at that time. But underneath that completely wrong programming title was also a correct subtitle: The House will complete work on legislation to protect free speech on social media.

Then suddenly, with a Democratic representative ramping up for a full-frontal attack on Taibbi and Schellenberger, CSPAN cut away from these dramatic and important hearings to go to the House floor coverage where the chaplain led the august body in prayer. It was at that moment that I found myself wishing that I was a believer.