What I Wrote on the NYTimes 2 Days After #MeToo

So I actually wrote more in between the Weinstein story breaking in the the Times and the New Yorker and Alyssa Milano’s first #MeToo tweet on October 15th. But it’s juicy and I’m saving that juice for just the right moment.

Till then, let us jump ahead to when I first heard that this ‘me too’ idea I’d floated in a comment to Lena Dunham’s piece on Oct 10th had turned into the #MeToo firestorm on the 15th.

I can’t be absolutely certain but I am fairly sure I first heard about it all on the New York Times website, reading the October 16 article by Jim Rutenberg, Rachel Abrams, and Melena Ryzik entitled Harvey Weinstein’s Fall Opens the Floodgates in Hollywood, telling of, among other things, the explosion that #MeToo was still growing into.

October 17

A week ago, in the comments section of the Lena Dunham piece published in this paper called Harvey Weinstein and the Silence of the Men, I wrote this:

jammer los angeles October 10, 2017 “Here’s what really needs to happen now. Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, “Me, too.” 

Whether it was my comment a week ago or, as this piece today suggests, Alyssa Milano’s tweet that inspired the #metoo hashtag is relatively unimportant. But if it was me, then I want to emphasize my concern that the focus should remain on Hollywood and the unique environment in which Harvey Weinstein was able to carry on for decades preying on the hopes and dreams of aspiring actresses and models as an open and often humorously downplayed secret. 

Any and every woman who has endured sexual harassment of any kind should have a right to voice their own ‘me too’ at this moment. 

But the focus must remain on Hollywood. For nowhere on earth is there a place where every year wave upon wave of young hopefuls come crashing against a system of sexual predation manned by those who use their entrenched power over everyone’s career in the business to prey upon so many young women. 

Hollywood has for too long operated far beyond the reach of laws protecting women against sexual misconduct and the result is as predictable as human nature itself. But it will never stop if attention is diverted elsewhere.

I’m going to leave it there for today except to add an obvious point. I no longer feel that it is relatively unimportant what or who exactly inspired #MeToo. 😉

What I Was Saying Before #MeToo Addendum

A rare same-day supplement to what was posted this morning. It’s pretty germane to the whole point of the last few days here. It is me extemporaneously relating to my friends on a certain message board that I had the previous day suggested ‘me too’ and this message was posted still four days before Alyssa Milano’s call for women to do the same exact thing. One thing I should add. Ms. Milano has said that her reason for her #MeToo call was so that we might get a better understanding of the scope of this problem. In both my original suggestion in the comments sections of the Dunham op-ed and in the excerpt from the message board I post on I express the same reasoning behind women using ‘me too.’

And it WAS my reasoning. I must confess one thing right now and this is key to why I even called for ‘me too’ to be used in this context in the first place. I wanted to get an idea of the numbers, which I suggested would be in the tens of thousands, of women IN THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY who had experienced this behavior in pursuit of their careers in Hollywood. That really was my sole focus. As much as it provides great pride and hope to me and of course the many tens of millions of women around the world who have rallied behind #MeToo, I have to admit I’m still laser-focused on the entertainment industry. I’ll explain that in the coming days.

Anyway, I would point out something else. This bit that I’m posting now is actually a continuation of the same message board comment in the previous blog post here on 50lux.com. Brevity is not my strongest point. 😉

October 11th

I wrote a comment on the Lena Dunham piece that said that what needs to happen now is a sea of women, from Oscar winners to girls who abandoned their careers after six months of this shit, to come forward if they were ever faced or offered, either overtly or with a wink, some role, representation, some other advancement of their career in the entertainment industry, to just come forward and say, Me, too. I don’t know how many women will do that. But I know that the number of women who COULD would be in the hundreds of thousands. Hundreds of thousands. 

So I think Mira Sorvino and Angelina Jolie both have Oscars. And Bob’s your uncle they were out there today letting the world know that Harvey had done some shit to them. That’s just Harvey. This reaches so far beyond one guy. But that’s a great start. When I typed that shit, I thought, jammer, really? Oscar winners? But there we have it. Anyway.

What I Was Saying Before #MeToo

The New York Times‘ Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey piece finally blowing the lid off Harvey Weinstein’s not-so-secret other life was published on October 5th. It was followed by the Ronan Farrow article in The New Yorker on October 10th.

I called for women who had victims of sexual predation in the entertainment industry to come forward saying, ‘me too’ on October 10th.

Alyssa Milano ignited the world wide firestorm known as the #MeToo movement on the 15th of October.

So what else was I posting online in the time between the breaking of the Weinstein story and Ms. Milano’s tweet on the 15th? (Exactly not a single solitary soul has ever asked.)

Here are some excerpts. I’m posting them to provide some context as to who I am and what I was thinking in the time period after this story broke but before #MeToo blindsided the world just days later. (I’m sure I’m dreaming now but should any legitimate news source require links to the original locations of these rants, I will gladly provide those.)

(I’ve trimmed these and also removed the cursing. That took hours. 😉

October 11th, 2017

Harvey Weinstein’s most egregious behaviors are only the tip of the iceberg is now, finally, a truth being said out loud.

Here is a slice from a comment on the NYTimes’ Lena Dunham piece.

“The Hollywood studio system is an incredible machine for building economic power structures by entrenching potentates in positions to exploit all comers.”

– smokepainter

The key points of this simple but oh-so-true statement are ‘incredible’ and ‘all comers.’ 

‘Incredible’ because it is the case that, as I may have said here in another thread, the career/sex quid pro quo is the coin-of-the-realm in Hollywood. Just think about that. How large and lucrative and glamorous and desirable a successful Hollywood career is. And that there exists within various stages of these careers a transactional relationship between the men who hold the power to make careers happen and the most beautiful young people in the world. (The vast majority who you will never see nor hear of.)

So is that not incredible? That there exists in one of the most modern crown jewel cities in the most liberal stronghold of a state in at least one of the countries in this world with the strongest workplace protections around these many unacceptable situations, an industry, the largest and richest in the region, wherein the coin-of-the-realm is still a sex/career advancement quid pro quo involving the young, beautiful, and ambitous, and the grizzled and horny men who control everything?

‘All comers?’ Yes. Of course. So let’s start with this. For most people coming to this area in pursuit of their show business dreams there is a very quick realization that this is an extremely expensive place to even live, pay rent, and eat. So whatever desires they have to make it in Hollywood quickly become a full-blown desperation to make it in Hollywood.

I don’t want to use the word ‘everyone’ and be seen as overstating something due to a too-literal reading of this, but most everyone in Hollywood encounters on every level men who are able to open career doors and opportunities for a little taste of the goods. The decisions are made by those who either want to slide into those opportunities at that time or walk away, and most likely begin the process of the inevitable walking away entirely from the dream of making it in Hollywood.

But what evidence of all of this sprouts forth so rarely into public view? The quotes above of the actor who was fondled in front of his wife. Look at them hard. They represent a transaction. I was fondled. I will not pursue the matter legally in any way. I want to continue on, sirs. In my career. Now Harvey Weinstein’s outing has opened a door and so I’ll tell my story to the public.

No doubt this is brave, but what does it tell anyone who is willing to do a little forensic analysis and some super low-level but practical math in their heads about what the realities must be in Hollywood? It’s that every form of sexual interaction imaginable, at every career stage and level of the entertainment field, is a quantified factor that must be dealt with, weighed, accepted, rejected, navigated around, etc. in order to make it in this town.

Today, a lot of the conversation turned to things that I have been hoping to hear. There was talk of how widespread this was throughout Hollywood. So check that box. But also there was a considerable bit of touching on the illegality of some of the things that have been going on, I would say for almost a hundred years… but let’s just keep things current for now.

But what I don’t quite hear anyone talking about, now or ever, is where has local state and federal law enforcement been over the many decades? I mean, there is a place in America, and this is it, where huge industries dominate the economic landscape, and within those industries people are behaving any way they damn well want to in the workplace, even in ways that are illegal, that prey upon the hopes and dreams of creative talented people, especially women, and nobody has lifted a finger to stop it for over half a century if not more.

Law enforcement? I’m not going to ask, as an Angelino, Where are they? I already know. But people outside of all of this SHOULD I would hope eventually get around to the question of who the hell was supposed to be enforcing laws against sexual predation in the workplace around here?

So where was law enforcement in an industry that everyone here knows operates with sexual favors being a part of the make or break realities of careers?

The issue here isn’t so much guys dangling their junk in front of women, like Harvey did. But guys dangling movie and television business success and riches and fame in front of women, which is something Harvey also did. And he certainly is just the tip of the iceberg. A writer/producer was on CNN this evening and said that even after her encounter with Harvey, who offered her a 3-picture deal if she would only watch him masturbate, that she basically pulled back from the business because she didn’t want to be made to feel like a hooker every single day.

Key points there. Hooker. And every single day. A provider of sexual favors for money. Every single day. What the hell? Yeah.

So when I talk about California. How big and how rich it is, and all of what that means, this is just one of those things. Actually two. The entertainment industry and all the things that go on within that industry that are just now starting to make their way into the ears and eyes of the public. And the second thing is the complete lack of any response, EVER, from law enforcement. Sure, the women themselves were and naturally would have been loath to pick up a phone and call 911 to report that Harvey Weinstein had just masturbated in front of them. Careers would have ended. Many did anyway just for refusing. The industry’s famously vicious legal response would have kicked in and sought to crush not only the allegations, but would have made clear that the person bringing the allegation would also find themselves in dire dire straits legally and financially. Counter-suits and threats of even possible criminal charges were not unheard of in the push back of the industry in protecting itself.

But still, the law is the law. It should send chills that in one of the largest and most modern cities in the world, right here in the US, all of this could be happening for basically the entire history of the entertainment industry with little or no efforts by law enforcement to investigate what everyone knows and knew was occurring in the suites of power as well as off-campus.

To be continued…


Breaking My Silence

Over the course of the last two months, in mostly confused ways that were neither well thought out nor very efficient, I’ve tried to get the information I’m going to share here now in this blog post out and in front of the public. I say confused because of the dizzying panoply of emotions and concerns I’ve experienced since being awakened to the news that a hashtag and the phrase ‘me too’ had become a singular viral moment of empowerment for women in their fight to free themselves from the sexual predations of evil men as well as the mechanisms of power, intimidation, and control that have too long silenced their ranks and allowed all of us to ignore the vast size and scope of their problem.

One thing I’ve learned about myself in the last 6 weeks is that I don’t know how to do something very well that I’d always thought I was probably pretty good at. That would be getting my message out there and into the hands of anyone who might need to hear that message or spread it for me. Maybe if I had truly possessed the courage of my convictions, I would have been at least consistent in my efforts. But I was not consistent and whatever courage I might have was tempered by deep concerns and reservations about attaching my name and any role I might have played in sparking the idea of the #metoo moment to this now massive world-wide phenomenon.

I will relate only one concern here, out of scores of more personal concerns.

I have not wanted at all to do anything that would slow the momentum of the #metoo movement, anything that might stop one solitary girl somewhere from using the hashtag as a means of speaking out about her dilemma, or anything that might change the global conversation from the message of #metoo and the impact it has had in allowing women to fight back against the scourge of sexual predation as it exists in far too many of their lives.

Both Tarana Burke and Alyssa Milano are able and worthy warrior/activists and have been amazing front-persons for the #metoo movement. Nothing can take away or should diminish in any way their work or their ongoing impact, as measured by the historic milestone they and all women achieved today when the #metoo movement was named Time Magazine’s collective Person of the Year: The Silence Breakers

I have a beautiful wife who I’ve been with for 42 years. She is a working woman. A good portion of my entire adult life has been spent calculating on a daily and granular level what I might need to do today or tomorrow or twenty years from now to keep her protected. The sexual revolution that #metoo represents is something that, for me, indicates a hoped for future where women and girls might be safer to move through this world, either walking down a street at night or through the corridors of their careers, without requiring a man to act as their personal guard dog.

I’m going to post now a series of screenshots. Please pay particular attention to the dates. Also feel free to click on the images for full sized versions.

The first screenshot is of Alyssa Milano’s first tweet on Oct. 15th calling for women who have been the victims of sexual assault or harassment to come forward by using the words ‘me too.’  Ms. Milano posts her tweet with what seems to be a smart phone screen capture that attributes the idea of using ‘me too’ for this purpose to ‘a friend.’

A little over 27 hours later, on Oct 16th, Ms. Milano tweets that she was “just made aware of an earlier #metoo movement” and links to a website that tells the story of Ms. Burke’s prior utilization of the phrase ‘me too’ in relation to the sexual assault of women or girls.

The next screen shot is of an article and a comment to that article on the New York Times website. I will excerpt from the comment below but if you wish to check the actual screen shot you will definitely need to click on this image as the text as posted in the body of this piece is too small to read. The article is from Oct 9th, was written by the actress Lena Dunham, and is entitled Harvey Weinstein and the Silence of the Men. The comment on the right was posted on Oct 10th. It was written by me, posting under the username ‘jammer,’ five days prior to Ms. Milano’s first ‘me too’ tweet.

Here is the relevant part of my comment.

Men control the short and long-term career opportunities of thousands of the most desirable women on earth in what must be the most glamorous and lucrative career environment in human history, as has been the case for almost a century.

Are we really going to be concerned only about the most salacious and outrageous stories? About the one or a half dozen men who take things too far?

Because that has not been the story of Hollywood in this area and it shouldn’t be the general public’s take away this time. Know this. Behind the literal and metaphorical gates of those studios is a world beyond the reach of laws protecting women against all forms of workplace sexual misconduct and the result is as predictable as human nature itself.

Here’s what really needs to happen now. Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, “Me, too.” From Oscar winners to those who abandoned their dreams and went back home.

I don’t know how many women would actually come forward. I do know the number who could would be beyond belief. But men in the industry aren’t going to fix this, why would they?

In the days following the online explosion that #metoo became, articles identifying Tarana Burke, based on her earlier use of the phrase in this context, as the person behind the hashtag phenomenon were published by The New York Times, The Washington Post,  CNN, Buzzfeed, Al Jazeera, The Boston Globe, Elle, and The Huffington Post among many others.

I don’t want to, nor can I, take anything away from Tarana Burke. She came up with this phrase and used it in this context nearly a decade before either me or Alyssa Milano. And she is the perfect voice to lead the worldwide army of women who have taken up the fight to free themselves from this most wretched behavior that has long been forced upon them by men and the power structures men have created. But Ms. Milano’s tweets clearly indicate that she didn’t get the idea for #metoo from Ms. Burke and that she knew nothing of Ms. Burke’s prior use of the term ‘me too’ in this context when she set off a worldwide movement with her first #metoo tweet on Oct. 15th.

And let me say this very clearly. I too had never heard of Ms. Burke or the use of the phrase ‘me too’ in this or any context remotely like this prior to making my own post advocating women coming forward behind the phrase in my comment to the Dunham piece on Oct. 10th.

Alyssa Milano’s initial ‘me too’ tweets on the 15th and 16th of October say two things.

Tweet 1. This is not my idea.
Tweet 2. This was not Tarana Burke’s idea.

Tarana Burke did not launch the #metoo movement. She may have first thought of the idea of using the phrase in the context of a means to respond to the sexual abuse of women and girls and she may be now one of the movement’s most perfect representatives. But she is not the woman, or person, behind the global phenomenon that is #metoo.

The person who launched #metoo is the actress Alyssa Milano. And she plainly states in her first tweet on Oct 15th that she did not conceive of the idea herself, that it came to her from a friend. And in the second tweet the following day, on Oct 16th, when the #metoo hashtag was already a global movement, Ms. Milano clearly says that she had only then just heard of Tarana Burke’s prior use of the phrase in this context.

When I’m on the New York Times, of which I am a subscriber, there is a popup ad that says something about the paper always seeking the truth. I’m sure the Times and all the publications who missed or downplayed the significance of Ms. Milano’s own tweets regarding the origins of #metoo do always seek out the truth and to inform the public by passing along that truth to their readers. It’s an incredibly important function. In the world and country we live in now it may be the single most important function of any of our failing institutions. But in this case, the truth is that the Times and a host of other first-rate publications failed to get to the exact truth behind the #metoo phenomenon and to get this movement’s origin story right.

The Lena Dunham piece was among the first wave of articles on the Harvey Weinstein scandal published in the Times. This was at a moment when everyone remotely interested in this slowly breaking story, and that included, if reports are to be believed, most everyone in the entertainment industry, would have been, as I was, devouring every word published in the New York Times or anywhere else where this story and its many sidebars were being published. And as just about anyone who is regularly consuming news or political information on the Times would readily tell you, the comments sections are usually a must-read extension to the news or commentary in the main articles.

I have more than a bit of ADD and the levels of irony here have been hard for me to keep track of. To an article that calls out men for their silence on the subject of the sexual harassment of women in Hollywood, I speak up and write a comment that suggests that men in Hollywood would not solve this problem for women, that women would need to do this themselves, and that women who had been victimized by the sexual predations of men in the entertainment industry should come forward by simply saying ‘me too.’

And then five days later, whoosh! That very idea is now a worldwide movement.

And yet I’ve never felt more silent.

My sister asked me, in a tone I still haven’t quite gotten over, “What do you want from this, credit?” It’s beyond a good question. It’s one of the toughest questions I’ve ever had to consider. I have a voice. Mostly online. I’ve been posting my dreadful political opinions on the internet since the epic Lewinsky Scandal thread on the now long gone New York Times forums.  As a lifelong Democrat, I was passionately engaged in defending the Democratic president from what I thought a witchhunt by Republicans and the special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr. That’s a hard position to explain now, in the present climate of sexual politics. But back then, it was a no-brainer for any left-leaning person, including many famous feminist voices.

But I’ve never stopped. Here’s an entire WordPress blog that was devoted to my rants on the 2008 Democratic primary alone. I write about politics almost every day of my life and post my stuff to a select group of online friends to a degree they would all so readily admit is eye-rolling.

So in answering my sister’s question I would offer these thoughts. In the almost two months since #metoo became what it is, I have sat and watched it all through many often changing thoughts and emotions. But it seems now to have settled on, if I must be totally honest with myself and anyone reading this, a general feeling of both being heard, but not acknowledged. That might sound somewhat self-serving, but remember, I am a politically motivated person, as is Ms. Burke and Ms. Milano. I don’t produce empty utterances. What I write is generally unique and as full of impact as I can make it. I work and write hard and put 60 years of life’s experience into what I post online. It might not be read but by a few people on a message board somewhere, but when I write things, I often write as if I’m exposing new information to the world. As I am now. It’s simply who I am and what I’ve been doing online for over 20 years. It’s representative of a very firm belief in one’s own unique perspective. And for better or worse, whether curse or blessing, I have that in spades.

So I would ask anyone reading this. Look at the dates on the screen captures I’ve posted here. Imagine that you had posted two months ago on the New York Times, the newspaper of record, in the comments section of what you knew was a widely read article, the comment that I posted on October 10th. And imagine how you would feel today when Time Magazine announced, essentially, that the #metoo movement had been named Person of the Year. How would you feel? If there’s a handbook on how someone should feel at a moment like this please get that handbook to me, because I’m flailing away at the notion of trying to settle on how I’m supposed to feel.

#metoo is now completely unstoppable and both Tarana Burke and Alyssa Milano are deserving icons of a worldwide movement. I do feel that now that gives me a measure of freedom, whether anyone can understand that or not. I can’t hurt this movement or take anything away from it by now pointing out that a 60-year-old man might have been a catalyst in the creation of this landmark moment for women. It’s a good thing. I wasn’t one of Lena Dunham’s silent men. And don’t look now but I’ve got a lot more to say.

The idea that women who had been prayed upon by men in the entertainment industry should come forward and say so simply by articulating the words ‘me too’ was, in the passing moment of one more political story of a busy week, what I’m sure I would have thought at the time just one more clever idea thrown out to the world never to hear back from it again. Alyssa Milano says, in today’s POTY article that she posted the idea of #metoo “almost on a whim.” Not exactly the same thing for me but being perfectly honest with myself, it really was just one more thing I had to say on the internet that day. What has happened since has left me, in turns, reeling, elated, at times deeply moved and proud, but, again, to be honest, often unsatisfied and unsettled at the same time. My wife and I sometimes groan when someone describes a personal experience as surreal. I don’t think we’ll be groaning about that any time soon.

The #metoo movement is now historically important. That women have this tool now to unite their voices to fight what has been their burden throughout history is deserving of every possible moment of recognition. But the origin story is also important. We can’t pick and choose which origin story best supports the most helpful narrative going forward. It doesn’t work like that. Or at least it shouldn’t.

Okay, if you’ve read this far I’ll give you a bonus thought. It’s representative of the extreme reservations that have had me sitting back mostly in silence for the last six weeks.

Remember Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion? It’s the story of two ditzy underachievers who have to face both the mean girls and tough questions at their high school reunion.

So, Mi-chelle! What are you up to?

Oh, okay. Um, I invented Post-Its.

I don’t want to be that. It’s a grave concern of mine. And I’m afraid that when I hit ‘publish’ on this piece, it’s going to be much worse than that. But there’s a world of women out there, especially in the field of entertainment, who have shown a bravery in the face of the power to destroy them that inspires me.

To man up.

Wish me luck.

Donald Barnat



* (note) This blog post will be edited in an ongoing effort to make the writing clearer or to add pertinent facts or information or clarifications as I deem necessary. The title has also been tweaked or changed entirely a number of times and might be again.